Self Build Kernel-RPMs instead of k_deflt with ALICE?

From: Link Johannes (Johannes.Link_at_fth2.siemens.de)
Date: Fri Oct 19 2001 - 14:33:25 CEST

Next message: Jürgen Henge-Ernst: "Re: [alice] Self Build Kernel-RPMs instead of k_deflt with ALICE?"
Previous message: Jürgen Henge-Ernst: "Re: [alice] Win95 FAT32 partition"
Next in thread: Jürgen Henge-Ernst: "Re: [alice] Self Build Kernel-RPMs instead of k_deflt with ALICE?"
Reply: Jürgen Henge-Ernst: "Re: [alice] Self Build Kernel-RPMs instead of k_deflt with ALICE?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Message-ID: <22A6027EB0B5134587370CCC1D09F537EF8801@fthw961a.os.fth.sbs.de>
From: Link Johannes <Johannes.Link@fth2.siemens.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 14:33:25 +0200
Subject: Self Build Kernel-RPMs instead of k_deflt with ALICE?

Hi everybody,

I´m trying to install a self-build kernel.rpm with alice-0.9.3_test-9.
During the installation everything seems to work fine, but after the kernel
installation
the system makes a reboot and hangs due to a wrong /etc/lilo.conf.
Is there any way to tell YaST that the boot-image is
/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.10-64GB-SMP
instead of /boot/vmlinuz ?

Thanks for advise.

Mit freundlichem Gruß / kind regards
Johannes Link
Siemens Business Services
SBS ITS AHS 241 CoE
Würzburger Str. 121
90766 Fürth
Deutschland
Fon: +49 911 978-3728
Fax: +49 911 978-4080
eFax: +49 911 978-10 3728
Email: johannes.link@siemens.com

Next message: Jürgen Henge-Ernst: "Re: [alice] Self Build Kernel-RPMs instead of k_deflt with ALICE?"
Previous message: Jürgen Henge-Ernst: "Re: [alice] Win95 FAT32 partition"
Next in thread: Jürgen Henge-Ernst: "Re: [alice] Self Build Kernel-RPMs instead of k_deflt with ALICE?"
Reply: Jürgen Henge-Ernst: "Re: [alice] Self Build Kernel-RPMs instead of k_deflt with ALICE?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Jun 25 2003 - 22:19:26 CEST