Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 20:19:12 +0100 (CET) From: Mattias Hermansson <mattias@hemmet.chalmers.se> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0003021928350.943-100000@glutus.hemmet.chalmers.se> Subject: Good news!
I compiled lame 3.51 with ccc. The speedincrease was exceptional, more
than 3 times the speed of gcc. That's how it's supposed to be. Look here:
# ./lame -f cdda.wav
LAME version 3.51 (www.sulaco.org/mp3)
GPSYCHO: GPL psycho-acoustic model version 0.74.
Encoding cdda.wav to cdda.wav.mp3
Encoding as 44.1 kHz 128 kbps j-stereo MPEG1 LayerIII file
Frame | CPU/estimated | time/estimated | play/CPU | ETA
8226/ 8226(100%)| 0:00:27/ 0:00:27| 0:00:28/ 0:00:28| 7.9993| 0:00:00
on my 21164a@600. gcc only does so good:
# lame cdda.wav
LAME version 3.51 (www.sulaco.org/mp3)
GPSYCHO: GPL psycho-acoustic model version 0.74.
Encoding cdda.wav to cdda.wav.mp3
Encoding as 44.1 kHz 128 kbps j-stereo MPEG1 LayerIII file
Frame | CPU/estimated | time/estimated | play/CPU | ETA
8226/ 8226(100%)| 0:01:35/ 0:01:35| 0:01:36/ 0:01:36| 2.2744| 0:00:00
gcc using full optimization and ccc only -g3. Unfortunately the ccc binary
only works with fast and not with normal/high quality encoding. The gcc
otoh doesn't work in fast mode, so the comparisons isn't very accurate,
but they indicate that ccc is MUCH better than gcc. Thank you Compaq!
/Mattias
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Mon Jun 04 2001 - 04:18:03 PDT