Message-ID: <41EE3DD1A283D211A7B800008368D23E3089DE@mails.ffw.univie.ac.at> From: Hirsch Wolfgang <hirsch@mails.ffw.univie.ac.at> Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 09:32:50 +0100 Subject: AW: [suse-axp] Good news!
Where can I get ccc and can I use it i. g. for compiling the kernel?
Wolfgang
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Mattias Hermansson [mailto:mattias@hemmet.chalmers.se]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 02. März 2000 20:19
> An: suse-axp@suse.com
> Betreff: [suse-axp] Good news!
>
>
>
> I compiled lame 3.51 with ccc. The speedincrease was exceptional, more
> than 3 times the speed of gcc. That's how it's supposed to
> be. Look here:
>
> # ./lame -f cdda.wav
> LAME version 3.51 (www.sulaco.org/mp3)
> GPSYCHO: GPL psycho-acoustic model version 0.74.
> Encoding cdda.wav to cdda.wav.mp3
> Encoding as 44.1 kHz 128 kbps j-stereo MPEG1 LayerIII file
> Frame | CPU/estimated | time/estimated |
> play/CPU | ETA
> 8226/ 8226(100%)| 0:00:27/ 0:00:27| 0:00:28/ 0:00:28|
> 7.9993| 0:00:00
>
> on my 21164a@600. gcc only does so good:
>
> # lame cdda.wav
> LAME version 3.51 (www.sulaco.org/mp3)
> GPSYCHO: GPL psycho-acoustic model version 0.74.
> Encoding cdda.wav to cdda.wav.mp3
> Encoding as 44.1 kHz 128 kbps j-stereo MPEG1 LayerIII file
> Frame | CPU/estimated | time/estimated |
> play/CPU | ETA
> 8226/ 8226(100%)| 0:01:35/ 0:01:35| 0:01:36/ 0:01:36|
> 2.2744| 0:00:00
>
> gcc using full optimization and ccc only -g3. Unfortunately
> the ccc binary
> only works with fast and not with normal/high quality
> encoding. The gcc
> otoh doesn't work in fast mode, so the comparisons isn't very
> accurate,
> but they indicate that ccc is MUCH better than gcc. Thank you Compaq!
>
> /Mattias
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-axp-unsubscribe@suse.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: suse-axp-help@suse.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Mon Jun 04 2001 - 04:18:03 PDT