Re: [suse-axp] Good news!

From: Olaf Grundey (std10093@dial.techfak.uni-kiel.de)
Date: Fri Mar 03 2000 - 12:48:32 PST

  • Next message: Mattias Hermansson: "Re: [suse-axp] Good news!"

    Message-ID: <38C02520.6FBAACD6@dial.techfak.uni-kiel.de>
    Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 21:48:32 +0100
    From: Olaf Grundey <std10093@dial.techfak.uni-kiel.de>
    Subject: Re: [suse-axp] Good news!
    

    Mattias Hermansson wrote:
    >
    > I compiled lame 3.51 with ccc. The speedincrease was exceptional, more
    > than 3 times the speed of gcc. That's how it's supposed to be. Look here:

    > gcc using full optimization and ccc only -g3. Unfortunately the ccc binary
    > only works with fast and not with normal/high quality encoding. The gcc
    > otoh doesn't work in fast mode, so the comparisons isn't very accurate,
    > but they indicate that ccc is MUCH better than gcc. Thank you Compaq!

    In lame v3.51 there are several uninitialized variables which sometimes
    cause floating point exceptions.
    I made a patch against v3.62beta some days ago, which fixed these and a
    couple of other bugs/ compiler warnings (like casts from pointer to
    integer). This patch is already included in the CVS repository. It's
    worth trying the latest CVS version because there have been a lot of
    other improvements since v3.51.

    The CVS repository can be found at
    http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=290

     Olaf

    Olaf.Grundey@ppi.de



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Mon Jun 04 2001 - 04:18:04 PDT