Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 22:43:04 +0100 (CET) From: Mattias Hermansson <mattias@hemmet.chalmers.se> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0003032229060.6644-100000@glutus.hemmet.chalmers.se> Subject: Re: [suse-axp] Good news!
I bow and scrape, that did the trick. Working high/normal quality, and
more than 10x with fast encoding. With this speed my cd doesn't tag along,
and with high quality a whole 4x speed.
I got the beta 3.63 tarball, but not from CVS, as it was kinda
problematic. Are there any diffrences between the CVS and beta 3.63,
i.e. can I use this version, or are there more improvements?
/Mattias
On Fri, 3 Mar 2000, Olaf Grundey wrote:
> Mattias Hermansson wrote:
> >
> > I compiled lame 3.51 with ccc. The speedincrease was exceptional, more
> > than 3 times the speed of gcc. That's how it's supposed to be. Look here:
>
> > gcc using full optimization and ccc only -g3. Unfortunately the ccc binary
> > only works with fast and not with normal/high quality encoding. The gcc
> > otoh doesn't work in fast mode, so the comparisons isn't very accurate,
> > but they indicate that ccc is MUCH better than gcc. Thank you Compaq!
>
> In lame v3.51 there are several uninitialized variables which sometimes
> cause floating point exceptions.
> I made a patch against v3.62beta some days ago, which fixed these and a
> couple of other bugs/ compiler warnings (like casts from pointer to
> integer). This patch is already included in the CVS repository. It's
> worth trying the latest CVS version because there have been a lot of
> other improvements since v3.51.
>
> The CVS repository can be found at
> http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=290
>
>
> Olaf
>
> Olaf.Grundey@ppi.de
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-axp-unsubscribe@suse.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: suse-axp-help@suse.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Mon Jun 04 2001 - 04:18:04 PDT