RE: [suse-oracle] Suse 7.3 + Oracle ???

From: Michael Daskaloff (mdaskalo@tlogica.com)
Date: Thu Oct 04 2001 - 14:54:11 PDT

  • Next message: Michael Hasenstein: "Re: [suse-oracle] Suse 7.3 + Oracle ???" 

    Message-ID: <01C14D38.3FE71260@NADIA>
From: Michael Daskaloff <mdaskalo@tlogica.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 00:54:11 +0300
Subject: RE: [suse-oracle] Suse 7.3 + Oracle ???

    Thanks,
    unfortunately I subscribed to the mailing list too late 23-aug-2001 and didn't take the time to look through
    archives.

    Do you intend to do some kind of validation of Oracle8i and/or Oracle9i for SuSE 7.3?

    Regards,
    Mihail Daskalov

    ----------
    From: Michael Hasenstein[SMTP:mha@suse.com]
    Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 12:37 AM
    To: Michael Daskaloff
    Cc: suse-oracle@suse.com; Logan McLeod; 'Coates, Craig'
    Subject: Re: [suse-oracle] Suse 7.3 + Oracle ???

    Michael Daskaloff wrote:

    > This is not really a certified configuration - only the software on it is certified for Oracle.
    > Hardware is from different vendors. This doesn't really matter.
    > I suppose it might be a hardware component failure (this is what I blamed the first time - e.g. SDRAM memory failure, but that same hardware ran for whole 10 months under Mandrake 7.1 without even stopping Oracle

    I guess that was kernel 2.2? It's not exactly fair to compare our 2.4.4
    with a 2.2. Compare with our 2.2, not with 2.4. Couldn't find info on
    what kernel they had in 7.1, but since it's three releases back I
    suppose it must have been 2.2.

    > (online backups are implemented).
    > The software is SuSE 7.1 Professional Edition (Default Installation)+ SuSE Kernel 2.4.4 from SuSE's ftp site.
    > Forget about this problem. I hope it doesn't happen again.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Thu Oct 11 2001 - 14:55:29 PDT