RE: [suse-oracle] Suse 7.3 + Oracle ???

From: HIRST, Michael (Michael.Hirst@Axa-corporatesolutions.com)
Date: Thu Oct 04 2001 - 16:08:30 PDT

  • Next message: Peter Francis: "8i storage structure strategy"

    Message-ID: <163AF0550985D41184B30090279C24E67743CF@SAGRUS002>
    From: "HIRST, Michael" <Michael.Hirst@Axa-corporatesolutions.com>
    Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:08:30 -0400 
    Subject: RE: [suse-oracle] Suse 7.3 + Oracle ???
    

    I would like to make a point here. Getting an operating system and a
    database operating in a production environment is serious business and comes
    at a cost that needs to be born by the business/person or whatever is trying
    to do something serious and worthwhile. Wouldn't it be nice to know that
    after you have done your due diligence in matching up the business
    requirements to technology that you can be assured that the solutions that
    you have chosen can inter operate. Why do you think that hardware and
    software companies spend so much time and money in deterring the capability
    of there stuff. Think about it certifying software on different platforms
    takes money. Who is going to pay for the different hardware/software
    configurations necessary to test this. Putting this another way if we talk
    about companies that produce medicine that cures illness do you think that
    they do not pass along the R&D costs necessary to produce and market the
    drug.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Michael Hasenstein [mailto:mha@suse.com]
    Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 6:05 PM
    To: Michael Daskaloff
    Cc: suse-oracle@suse.com; 'Logan McLeod'
    Subject: Re: [suse-oracle] Suse 7.3 + Oracle ???

    Michael Daskaloff wrote:

    > OK.
    > The problem seems to be with me.
    > I actually didn't knew how costly and difficult a certification process
    could be.
    > Now I have an idea.
    >
    > Also I had missunderstand some things based on my previous experience with
    Oracle.
    > This my experience states the following:
    > If an operating system is not Certified by Oracle then Oracle WILL NOT
    INSTALL or NOT RUN on it.
    >
    > It seems that things maybe have changed.

    No. The only difference: So far, if a vendor took the time and effort do
    build a relationship with Oracle so that hey port their software to that
    platform, then of course, they'd also do a certification and not just
    the port itself (that would be pretty pointless); now with Linux they
    have the port anyway, and now certification or not is an additional,
    extra issue.

    > Can I just ask a final question:
    > Will I be able to install and run Oracle at a satisfactory perfomance and
    reliability level (I mean not crashing everyday and not running slower than
    on SuSE 7.1) on SuSE 7.3 Professional Edition

    Yes. And as I said, depending on effort, we'll continue to certify the
    Professional Edition
    - if we have the time
    - if it's not too much effort
    - only the database, iAS takes wayyyy too long and Apps 11i is so
    special and expensive (and also takes very long, like iAS, and requires
    a BIG system) that there's no question that someone has to pay.

    Again, we are trying to provide ADDED value, not to let you pay for what
    you already have, or to make money from other peoples work (the open
    source development community). This ethical attitude also makes business
    sense because against common sense and decency you cannot build a
    busines. That we made a loss on the certification so far - simply
    because we didn't have an SLES offering yet, Linux wasn't in the
    enterprise level class where anyone is willing to have certification,
    and because we wanted to be in the market very early and were willing to
    pre-finance - plus the fact that certification as of 9i is 3 weeks more
    complicated (to put it this way), we have to act as if we take something
    away, granted.

    > ? Will there be any new features or bugs which are known to prevent
    successfull running of Oracle under SuSE 7.3 Profesional or Personal
    Edition?

    No, I'm very confident it will run just fine. Oracle has few
    requirements, bascially kernel, glibc, and a running X. The subleties
    come in production use esp. of large systems.

    > I don't need RAC. I don't need expensive and complex hardware - just a
    couple of IDE or SCSI disks. I don't need Large memory support. I just need
    a general purpose Linux server for a small database (<20GB).

    Go ahead. We know this segment exists and of course try to be there,
    even without having a big profit there, simply because you cannot take
    ONLY the filet slices of the market, we want to be the Oracle-Linux
    leaders so we have to take care of the mass market as well. Only
    condition: it cannot be done at ANY cost, meaning the certifications.

    > I want to use this server for limited FTP, HTTP, SAMBA and other services.

    Sure...

    > P.S. Thank you Michael Hasenstein for taking time to answer
    > to questions of peanuts like me.

    Which is very risky to do, because a) this is "political" and any PR
    person will tell yuo to stay out of this type of discussion (I'm almost
    sure some people don't like me any more), and b) I don't hide my
    feelings (cannot?).

    Michael

    -- 
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-oracle-unsubscribe@suse.com
    For additional commands, e-mail: suse-oracle-help@suse.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Thu Oct 11 2001 - 14:55:29 PDT