[suse-sles-e] x86 or itanium?

jorgecab_at_intra.net.gt
Date: Wed Jan 11 2006 - 16:51:02 CET

Next message: Jeff Hanson: "Re: [suse-sles-e] x86 or itanium?"
Previous message: christoph.rothe_at_lhsystems.com: "RE: [suse-sles-e] "No Interface found" message during bootup SLES9"
Next in thread: Jeff Hanson: "Re: [suse-sles-e] x86 or itanium?"
Reply: Jeff Hanson: "Re: [suse-sles-e] x86 or itanium?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Message-ID: <1136994662.43c5296630499@webmail.solucionesintranet.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:51:02 -0600
From: jorgecab@intra.net.gt
Subject: [suse-sles-e] x86 or itanium?

Hi,

I have to setup 2 new servers (no cluster) with SLES9 that will act as
webservers. I can do it in 2 x86 intel servers or in 2 itanium servers. I know
that itanium has its problems but I don't know how well does it works with
SLES. Can anybody tell me their experience please?

Thanks

Jorge

--
d-_-b     \|/
          0-0
   ---oOo-(_)-oOo---
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sles-e-unsubscribe@suse.com
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sles-e-help@suse.com

Next message: Jeff Hanson: "Re: [suse-sles-e] x86 or itanium?"
Previous message: christoph.rothe_at_lhsystems.com: "RE: [suse-sles-e] "No Interface found" message during bootup SLES9"
Next in thread: Jeff Hanson: "Re: [suse-sles-e] x86 or itanium?"
Reply: Jeff Hanson: "Re: [suse-sles-e] x86 or itanium?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Jan 11 2006 - 16:51:14 CET