Re: [suse-sles-e] SuSEfirewall2 and bonding

From: Stefan Jakobs (stefan.jakobs_at_rus.uni-stuttgart.de)
Date: Wed Jul 12 2006 - 16:05:20 CEST

Next message: rslist: "Re: [suse-sles-e] SLE kernel patch info ?"
Previous message: Jeff Hanson: "Re: [suse-sles-e] SLE kernel patch info ?"
In reply to: fpoeta_at_pandminc.com: "Re: [suse-sles-e] SuSEfirewall2 and bonding"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

From: Stefan Jakobs <stefan.jakobs@rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:05:20 +0200
Message-Id: <200607121605.20742.stefan.jakobs@rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
Subject: Re: [suse-sles-e] SuSEfirewall2 and bonding

Hello,

Am Montag, 10. Juli 2006 15:53 schrieb fpoeta@pandminc.com:
> Yes, deleting ifcfg-bond0 will kill the bond after you issue a rcnetweork
> restart. But you must now configure you two previously bonded NICs and
> reconfig your firewall plus any other software that address bond0

What happens with the kernel modules, will they start again after a rcnetwork
restart?

Thanks for your help.
Kind regards
Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sles-e-unsubscribe@suse.com
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sles-e-help@suse.com

Next message: rslist: "Re: [suse-sles-e] SLE kernel patch info ?"
Previous message: Jeff Hanson: "Re: [suse-sles-e] SLE kernel patch info ?"
In reply to: fpoeta_at_pandminc.com: "Re: [suse-sles-e] SuSEfirewall2 and bonding"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Jul 12 2006 - 16:06:08 CEST