Re: [suse-sles-e] SLES10 - so, we can expect the same lowquality again?

From: Arun Singh (Arun.Singh_at_novell.com)
Date: Sat Jun 03 2006 - 02:02:38 CEST


Message-Id: <44806F2A.24BF.0042.0@novell.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 18:02:38 -0600
From: "Arun Singh" <Arun.Singh@novell.com>
Subject: Re: [suse-sles-e] SLES10 - so, we can expect the same lowquality again?


>>> On 6/2/2006 at 3:10 PM, "Alexei_Roudnev"
<Alexei_Roudnev@exigengroup.com> wrote:
...
>
> And again, many people (much more then direct beta testers) have
access to
> Beta's - why don't have a reliable feedback from them?
> As I said earlier, there are a clear bugs, obvious from the very
first
> attempt (may be, some caused by unusual configuration - I think so)
-
> what's the use in pretending that this bugs do no exists?

This is a problem as there should be some way to send beta feedback. It
shouldn't matter who is reporting as this is for betterment of SUSE
Linux.

Hope responsible folks will look into creating some form of feedback
channel in future. May be: Create generic Novell Bugzilla Beta account,
let people enter bug and evaluate it based on critical nature. People
can track it based on bugzilla id.

-Arun

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sles-e-unsubscribe@suse.com
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sles-e-help@suse.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Jun 03 2006 - 02:02:54 CEST