From: Marcus Meissner (meissner_at_suse.de)
Date: Sat Jun 03 2006 - 08:56:49 CEST
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 08:56:49 +0200 From: Marcus Meissner <meissner@suse.de> Message-ID: <20060603065649.GA15701@suse.de> Subject: Re: [suse-sles-e] SLES10 - so, we can expect the same lowquality again?
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 06:02:38PM -0600, Arun Singh wrote:
> >>> On 6/2/2006 at 3:10 PM, "Alexei_Roudnev"
> <Alexei_Roudnev@exigengroup.com> wrote:
> ...
> >
> > And again, many people (much more then direct beta testers) have
> access to
> > Beta's - why don't have a reliable feedback from them?
> > As I said earlier, there are a clear bugs, obvious from the very
> first
> > attempt (may be, some caused by unusual configuration - I think so)
> -
> > what's the use in pretending that this bugs do no exists?
>
> This is a problem as there should be some way to send beta feedback. It
> shouldn't matter who is reporting as this is for betterment of SUSE
> Linux.
There is, for regular SLES beta testers. Alexei is not.
> Hope responsible folks will look into creating some form of feedback
> channel in future. May be: Create generic Novell Bugzilla Beta account,
> let people enter bug and evaluate it based on critical nature. People
> can track it based on bugzilla id.
Report bugs against SUSE Linux 10.1 in this case via http://bugzilla.novell.com/
SUSE Linux 10.1, as repeated some times already, is the base of SLES 10.
Ciao, Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sles-e-unsubscribe@suse.com
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sles-e-help@suse.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Jun 03 2006 - 08:56:53 CEST