From: Dr J Pelan (J.Pelan_at_gatsby.ucl.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Mar 02 2006 - 21:07:40 CET
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:07:40 +0000 (GMT) From: Dr J Pelan <J.Pelan@gatsby.ucl.ac.uk> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0603021902370.9418@godel.gatsby.ucl.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [suse-sles-e] OCFS2 support
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Alexei Roudnev wrote:
> Problem is not in support.
Please read the thread, then you will see it was specifically addressing
the issue of *support* from Oracle when used with the Oracle db.
> Problem is that for now, OCFSv2 have not enough installation base in all
> _non Oracle related_ cases to be treated as _production grade stable_.
> So, for example, I should not use it for file server (OCFSv2, SAMBA +
> NFS over it).
That all depends on how you define 'production grade stable' and how you
act on that essentially subjective judgement. It is a circular argument to
suggest that it isn't ready for production until it is used in production!
Each case for deployment must be based on its own merits, including
fitness for purpose and costing failure. For some, OCFSv2 - like many
packages of a similar vintage and usage level - will be production ready.
-- John P. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sles-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sles-e-help@suse.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Thu Mar 02 2006 - 21:07:50 CET