From: Wade Grant (WGrant_at_mde.k12.ms.us)
Date: Mon Mar 13 2006 - 15:51:50 CET
Message-Id: <s41532c9.081@mde.k12.ms.us> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 08:51:50 -0600 From: "Wade Grant" <WGrant@mde.k12.ms.us> Subject: Re: [suse-sles-e] A better framework for named configuration
I too must agree. The FHS is there for a reason and I like that.
However I must say that the DNS module does have significant
shortcomings that need to be addressed.
I haven't tested with 10 yet but 9.3 corrupts named.conf
and some master files repeatedly when edited from withing the module.
I gave up on trying to import files from other systems.
wade G.
"Privilege becomes arrogance. Arrogance promotes injustice. The seed of ruin blossom."
Frank Herbert. 1984. God Emperor of Dune.
>>> Silviu Marin-Caea <silviu_marin-caea@fieldinsights.ro> 03/13/06 07:00AM >>>
On Monday 13 March 2006 05:35, Michael James wrote:
> While many of the YaST modules are excellent,
> the SuSE approach to configuring named
> has 3 big problems:
No, you are not familiar with the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard. The files
are in the right place.
The problem with the YaST DNS server module is that it doesn't work. I have
just recently tried to use it on a fully updated system. It has created
duplicate entries in named.conf, it gave an error when saving to LDAP, it
erased the root hints. It was utter brain-damage.
I had to edit named.conf to fix it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sles-e-unsubscribe@suse.com
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sles-e-help@suse.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sles-e-unsubscribe@suse.com
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sles-e-help@suse.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Mon Mar 13 2006 - 15:52:36 CET