Re: [suse-sles-e] SLES License

From: Lars Müller (lmuelle_at_SuSE.de)
Date: Tue Mar 14 2006 - 10:29:03 CET


Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:29:03 +0100
From: Lars Müller <lmuelle@SuSE.de>
Message-ID: <20060314092903.GJ20649@gray.suse.de>
Subject: Re: [suse-sles-e] SLES License


On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 09:59:10AM +0100, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
[snip]
> I'm very interested about it, too. I'm in the same situation like you: I've
> considered to get the license for SLES, but my resources are little and this
> is not possible, simply, for economical reasons.

Then you should not consider to use SLES. For the reason see my later
reply to the initial question.

> I sopose that it's possible, so, in fact, there is a project that do it
> already: CentOS. CentOS is the Red Hat Enterprise Server rebuilded from
> sources licensed under GPL.

Wrong. Even CentOS can not relicense components under a different
license than the original project (PAM modules, OpenLDAP as two
examples) are.

Lars

-- 
Lars Müller [ˈlaË(r)z ˈmÊlÉ]
Samba Team
SuSE Linux, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany




This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Tue Mar 14 2006 - 10:29:07 CET