From: Peter Van Lone (petervl_at_gmail.com)
Date: Mon May 08 2006 - 18:00:38 CEST
Message-ID: <68b791330605080900g59b01dc2rf9bf94690a636267@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 11:00:38 -0500 From: "Peter Van Lone" <petervl@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [suse-sles-e] guidlelines for YOU use?
On 5/8/06, Peter Van Lone <petervl@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/8/06, Peter Van Lone <petervl@gmail.com> wrote:
> > these items are "security updates". I would think that they always
> > should be installed? There is no + next to them, however ...
> > generally, I should select these, or not?
+ patch-10189RecommendedRecommended update for file €
+ patch-10192RecommendedRecommended update for sles-release
+ patch-10196RecommendedRecommended update for reiserfs
+ patch-10198RecommendedRecommended update for parted
I really am confused .. why would the packages above NOT be selected
by default? (I added the + next to them)
Must one really go through the entire list of items like this, trying
to understand the need for each and every one of them?
P
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Mon May 08 2006 - 18:00:43 CEST