From: Michael Daskalov (mdaskalov_at_technologica.com)
Date: Tue Jul 10 2007 - 09:50:36 CEST
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:50:36 +0300 Message-ID: <15F26D0D9E18E24583D912511D668FF8015EE3FE@exchange.ad.tlogica.com> From: "Michael Daskalov" <mdaskalov@technologica.com> Subject: RE: [suse-sles-e] Is it possible to install SLES9 SP3 32bit asa XEN guest in SLES10 x86_64 bit with SP1
Hi Gordon,
I wish I hadn't asked this questions. Anyway for me better would mean -
which one would save me more troubles, while allowing to have both
64-bit and 32-bit SLES9 OS on the same physical machine, without a big
difference in performance (15 - 20% percent difference would be
acceptable).
Regards,
Mihail
-----Original Message-----
From: Gordon Ross [mailto:G.Ross@ccw.gov.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 10:38 AM
To: suse-sles-e@suse.com
Subject: Re: [suse-sles-e] Is it possible to install SLES9 SP3 32bit asa
XEN guest in SLES10 x86_64 bit with SP1
>>> On 10 July 2007 at 08:33, in message
<15F26D0D9E18E24583D912511D668FF8015EE3FD@exchange.ad.tlogica.com>,
"Michael
Daskalov" <mdaskalov@technologica.com> wrote:
> And the final question would it be better than VMWare ESX server?
Define "Better"
VMWare & XEN are different ways of doing virtualisation. They have
their own strengths and weaknesses.
GTG
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sles-e-unsubscribe@suse.com
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sles-e-help@suse.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sles-e-unsubscribe@suse.com
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sles-e-help@suse.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Tue Jul 10 2007 - 11:54:22 CEST