From: Gaël Lams (lamsgael_at_gmail.com)
Date: Wed Mar 07 2007 - 09:06:49 CET
Message-ID: <b93ea24d0703070006o3123c5d1l7e19f9d1ae826883@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 09:06:49 +0100 From: "Gaël Lams" <lamsgael@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [suse-sles-e] W3M Browser for registration
I've no idea regarding iSCSI or Oracle support but, to balance a
little bit what Alexei said (and I don't work for Novell ;-), I've
currently +/- 10 production SLES10 servers (not that much, I know)
providing several services (apache, php, zope, mysql, posfix,
spamassassin, horde, ...), with a local installation and update server
and, well, I've had no problem for the time being.
I feel so safe that I plan this year to start migrating my Lotus
Domino servers and all the remaining SuSe Professional 9.3 to SLES10
I've to say that:
- I don't use yast that much (one of the first things I do when I
configure a Postfix instance is to disable suseconfig ;-)
- fortunately I never had to install X on my servers .-)
- the first time I tried to register a system using yast I also was
pretty upset :-)
- I compiled a few softwares from source because I want to keep control of them
- I never tried SLES 9 so I've no idea how good it is/was
The fact is that I've also heared several complaints from RHEL users
in various mailing lists: no distribution is perfect but since I
started using suse on my servers 6 years ago, well, I never had a
problem (apart with a php security update on Suse 9.0 if I remember)
Regards,
Gaël
PS: The idea of a service pack for a linux distribution frighten me
quit a lot (makes me think to another operating system :-)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Mar 07 2007 - 11:10:37 CET