Re: [suse-sparc] kernel compile fails on ultrasparc64

From: Pieter Krul (pkrul@auxio.net)
Date: Thu Nov 02 2000 - 13:11:12 PST

  • Next message: Joshua Uziel: "Re: [suse-sparc] kernel compile fails on ultrasparc64"

    Message-ID: <3A01D870.72745F27@auxio.net>
    Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 22:11:12 +0100
    From: Pieter Krul <pkrul@auxio.net>
    Subject: Re: [suse-sparc] kernel compile fails on ultrasparc64
    

    Leif Sawyer wrote:
    >
    > Joshua Uziel [uzi@suse.com] writes:
    > > > Oh, so gcc out of the box is only 32 bit, and I've got down find the
    > > > 64-bit version somewhere? Okay. Be nice if this was blatently
    > > > documented, but I won't belabour the point. (i.e., the faq at
    > > > ultralinux.org doesn't mention a specific requirement for a 64-bit
    > > > gcc, only GCC version 2.7.x, or EGCS 1.0.3 and up.
    > >
    > > See the ultralinux.org FAQ, section 9, question 2 at:
    > > http://www.ultralinux.org/faq.html#q_9_2
    > >
    >
    > Oh.. down under running, but not under Section 7, question 2
    > (Building, what tools do i need) http://www.ultralinux.org/faq.html#q_7_2
    >
    > As i said, not blatently obvious.. Obfuscated yes. A bit of FAQ cleanup
    > would handle this.. :-)
    >
    > Perhaps Pieter would be so kind as to re-arrange some sections, or at
    > least link some of the info from 9.2 up to 7.2 where it really wants
    > to belong.

    Not so long ago people built Linux from a SunOS or Solaris environment.
    The Building section provides information on how this can be done.

    The soon-to-release version of the FAQ should clear things up for
    everyone who wants to build a new kernel from a Running Linux system.
    :-)

    Pieter



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Wed Jun 06 2001 - 11:08:14 PDT