Re: [suse-sparc] kernel compile fails on ultrasparc64

From: Joshua Uziel (uzi@suse.com)
Date: Thu Nov 02 2000 - 13:29:27 PST

  • Next message: Joshua Uziel: "Re: [suse-sparc] 64 bit kernel vs 32 bit"

    Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 13:29:27 -0800
    From: Joshua Uziel <uzi@suse.com>
    Message-ID: <20001102132927.C22367@gimp.org>
    Subject: Re: [suse-sparc] kernel compile fails on ultrasparc64
    

    * Leif Sawyer <lsawyer@gci.com> [001102 09:57]:
    > Great lenghts of detail if you read further down on my previous email
    > in this thread. However, to sum up:
    > 1 hme (built-in) - works
    > 1 hme + 1 qfe - works
    > 1 hme + 2 qfe - kernel oops.

    Oh, I read it... I guess I just misread it. :) Excellent detail, btw...

    > i'm in the middle of getting 2.4.0-test10 compiled and booting
    > on the machine to know if it's just a problem with the shipped
    > kernel or no.

    I'd love to know your results. From what you have so far, this bug
    isn't SuSE's fault... or anyones, really. I just don't know how often
    people pop 2 qfe's in the same SPARC/Linux machine... (this was
    commonplace when I worked on HA Clustering at SUN (on Solaris)).

    > (amazed at the level of response. :-> )

    I'm glad. :)



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Wed Jun 06 2001 - 11:08:14 PDT