Re: [suse-sparc] Re: [SLE] SuSE Sparc 7.0: stable?

From: Chris Wareham (chris.wareham@catchword.com)
Date: Thu Nov 23 2000 - 07:37:19 PST

  • Next message: Bob Drzyzgula: "Re: [suse-sparc] Re: [SLE] SuSE Sparc 7.0: stable?"

    Message-ID: <3A1D39AF.3030501@catchword.com>
    Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 15:37:19 +0000
    From: Chris Wareham <chris.wareham@catchword.com>
    Subject: Re: [suse-sparc] Re: [SLE] SuSE Sparc 7.0: stable?
    

    Lenz Grimmer wrote:

    >
    > On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Fabrizio Poggi wrote:
    >
    >> as you know, Red Hat has declared that the Sun Sparc platform will be
    >> no supported in future and recently SuSE announce the support of Sparc
    >> architecture in 7.0 release. My SS5 at work run now a 6.2 Red Hat
    >> (running slightly slow, some minor problems); before the announcement
    >> of SuSE, I was thinking to cut-off RH6.2 with a NetBSD solution. Now
    >> have some doubts. Any suggestion about, or previous experience with
    >> SuSE7 Sparc Edition (from the point of view of stability)?
    >
    > I am sure, the people over in suse-sparc can tell you more about this.
    >

    In reply to Fabrizio:

    RedHat have not dropped support for the SPARC architecture[1]. They
    didn't see enough of a market to justify a 7.0 release, but a 7.1
    release for SPARC is likely. The recent updates to the SPARC RawHide
    tree back this up as well. Personally, I'm going to wait around for
    RedHat 7.1, and if this doesn't materialise then I will switch to
    SuSE. Note that OpenBSD and NetBSD aren't an option if you're using
    a 24bit framebuffer like the Leo.

    Chris

    [1] see www.ultralinux.org



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Wed Jun 06 2001 - 11:08:20 PDT