Re: [suse-sparc] Re: [SLE] SuSE Sparc 7.0: stable?

From: Q89029292 (q8902929@topaz.cqu.edu.au)
Date: Thu Nov 23 2000 - 16:12:31 PST

  • Next message: Tor Sigurdsson: "Re: [suse-sparc] Re: [SLE] SuSE Sparc 7.0: stable?"

    Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 10:12:31 +1000 (EST)
    From: Q89029292 <q8902929@topaz.cqu.edu.au>
    Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.96.1001124095913.20782A-100000@topaz.cqu.edu.au>
    Subject: Re: [suse-sparc] Re: [SLE] SuSE Sparc 7.0: stable?
    

    On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Chris Wareham wrote:

    > Lenz Grimmer wrote:
    >
    > >
    > > On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Fabrizio Poggi wrote:
    > >
    > >> as you know, Red Hat has declared that the Sun Sparc platform will be
    > >> no supported in future and recently SuSE announce the support of Sparc
    > >> architecture in 7.0 release. My SS5 at work run now a 6.2 Red Hat
    > >> (running slightly slow, some minor problems); before the announcement
    > >> of SuSE, I was thinking to cut-off RH6.2 with a NetBSD solution. Now
    > >> have some doubts. Any suggestion about, or previous experience with
    > >> SuSE7 Sparc Edition (from the point of view of stability)?
    > >
    > > I am sure, the people over in suse-sparc can tell you more about this.
    > >
    >
    > In reply to Fabrizio:
    >
    > RedHat have not dropped support for the SPARC architecture[1]. They
    > didn't see enough of a market to justify a 7.0 release, but a 7.1
    > release for SPARC is likely. The recent updates to the SPARC RawHide
    > tree back this up as well. Personally, I'm going to wait around for
    > RedHat 7.1, and if this doesn't materialise then I will switch to
    > SuSE. Note that OpenBSD and NetBSD aren't an option if you're using
    > a 24bit framebuffer like the Leo.
    >
    > Chris
    >
    > [1] see www.ultralinux.org
    >
    >
    I switched from redhat 6.0 a long time ago as it had many issues at that
    time (S. Classic 4m leo frame buffer), I am currently using debian 2.2
    which is very stable (read high usage and long uptime). The only thing
    that goes splat (segfault) occasionally is Netscape.

    N.B. I did experience Watchdog resets with xlockmore and xscreensaver
    using debian 2.1 and promptly removed them, that was using the pre-release
    of glibc2.1 and patches applied to a 2.1.x kernel, I haven't tried them
    recently although at the time I sent in detailed bug reports using gdb
    attached to the running process from an xterm on another computer. The
    problem may be solved by now.

    I haven't tried Suse yet although I do have a box set aside for it and
    will in the near future.

    Regards,

    Peter Firmstone.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Wed Jun 06 2001 - 11:08:20 PDT