Re: [suse-sparc] success on Sparc 10 ;-)

From: Jason Byrne (jbyrne@thegrid.net)
Date: Fri Sep 15 2000 - 12:11:48 PDT

  • Next message: Pieter Krul: "Re: [suse-sparc] success on Sparc 10 ;-)"

    Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 12:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
    From: Jason Byrne <jbyrne@thegrid.net>
    Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009151210200.1832-100000@jason.jdog.org>
    Subject: Re: [suse-sparc] success on Sparc 10 ;-)
    

    On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:

    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > On Fri, Sep 15, Jason Byrne wrote:
    >
    > >
    > > ok... my Sparc 10 is up and running now with SuSE 7.0 -
    > >
    > > just a couple of notes since this is very much in development...
    > >
    > > 1) SMP kernel install failed on my machine - finally went with standard
    > > 32-bit kernel and I was able to complete the installation.
    >
    > Why failed the SMP kernel in your machine ? What are the error messages ?

    well... I only saw the generic 'Errors occured during installation'... and
    I couldn't recover in the installation at this point.

    Not sure if it's worth mentioning - but the installation doesn't
    necessarily 'crash' at this point... but trying to pick up install from
    NFS /cdrom mount doesn't start the transfer of files between machines
    again.

    I tried tinkering around with the Rescue system to get a bootable system -
    but I think I got lost in my temporary mounts... probably mixed up the
    SILO configuration a bit - not sure if I should just blame it on myself
    here ;-)

    I suppose I could try again and try to give some better feedback - now
    that I verified I can get a running system.

    I did notice the package regarding SMP detection (somewhere ;-) ) when I
    was adding to the install for later - maybe this is important for getting
    the kernel installed?

    >
    > >
    > > 2) SILO configuration (Yast 1) is set up to look for /sbin/lilo instead of
    > > /sbin/silo - easy enough to fix running SILO after 'lilo' failure. Of
    > > course writing lilo.conf by hand isn't a big deal... but the problem is
    > > probably worth noting if you like Yast. I didn't check Yast2 for the same
    > > issue.
    >
    > You don't need a lilo.conf, /boot/silo.conf is the config file for SPARCs.
    > But I wonder why YaST1 looks for /sbin/lilo, I will forward this to the
    > YaST developer.

    ok... this makes a bit of sense - since I did notice silo.conf on
    /boot. Also - when I ran /sbin/silo to rewrite the configuration... it
    doesn't give any response... 'Added Linux' or anything similar as on an
    x86 machine.

    I only decided I *should* check the SILO configuration because it doesn't
    mention installing it during the initial setup.

    >
    > > 3) eliminating 'pads' in doc series keeps initial 'minimal' install (83
    > > packages) on 1st CD - helpful for an nfs-mounted /cdrom.
    >
    > Yes, pads on the second CD is a bug and will be changed for the next
    > release.
    >
    > Thorsten
    >
    > --
    > Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ kukuk@suse.de
    > SuSE GmbH Schanzaeckerstr. 10 90443 Nuernberg
    > Linux is like a Vorlon. It is incredibly powerful, gives terse,
    > cryptic answers and has a lot of things going on in the background.

    thanks for all the help - I'm just thrilled to have the system up at this
    point.

    - Jason



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Wed Jun 06 2001 - 11:08:02 PDT