Re: [suse-sparc] quad ethernet

From: Joshua Uziel (uzi@suse.com)
Date: Wed Jan 24 2001 - 08:33:07 PST

  • Next message: Joshua Uziel: "Re: [suse-sparc] Sorry for mistake"

    Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 08:33:07 -0800
    From: Joshua Uziel <uzi@suse.com>
    Message-ID: <20010124083307.E13467@gimp.org>
    Subject: Re: [suse-sparc] quad ethernet
    

    * Witvliet, Hans <Hans.Witvliet@Alcatel.nl> [010124 07:59]:
    > Question 1) Is this board supported by linux?

    Yes, a qfe is 4 hme interfaces, and it is supported just fine.

    > Question 2) can this board do 10-base-T: I don't need fast ethernet, 10MB
    > will do nicely

    The board will do both 10 and 100mbit

    > Question 3) Is SUN's estimation correct, that no more than ONE board per
    > system is advisable?
    > If so, what is my alternative? What kind of system would have enough
    > "power"?

    Well, I've used 2 qfe's in an Ultra 2 (sbus machine) under Solaris with
    no problem. I've not tried it under Linux (even a single one). Someone
    was complaining about two not working together in their machine on the
    sparclinux@vger.kernel.org list a few months ago. I might still have
    that email, but check the archives (like the one at
    http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/) and see if you can find it first... if
    not, I can try to dig it up.

    > I thought that an ultra-5 is in the same catagory as an Intel-P-III, as we
    > do not have unused multi-cpu SUN's systems around here, should i opt for a
    > multi-intel-cpu system?

    If you need 8 interfaces, then in theory the U5 should be fine. Just
    check up on it first and then you make the call...



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Wed Jun 06 2001 - 11:08:35 PDT