Re: [suse-sparc] Compiling kernel 2.4.14 on Ultra 5

From: Ingo T. Storm (suse-sparc@computerbild.de)
Date: Wed Nov 28 2001 - 07:03:33 PST

  • Next message: Arren Mund: "[suse-sparc] nvram" 

    Message-ID: <007c01c1781e$4fc3f980$fa2ca8c0@OPTIMUS>
From: "Ingo T. Storm" <suse-sparc@computerbild.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:03:33 +0100
Subject: Re: [suse-sparc] Compiling kernel 2.4.14 on Ultra 5

    > So, my question was, is there a real difference between make
    > without any option and make with boot as argument.

    Seems not, as long as you get the "make dep; make clean" stuff right before
    the simple "make". I just prefer to tell make what to do, have different log
    files for the different steps and not do what it thinks is necessary, so I
    use make boot;-)

    >On another front, I tried to compile the latest freeswan and
    > got a bunch of errors in the process. Any clue?

    Sorry, never used FreeS/WAN.

    Ingo 

    -- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Wed Nov 28 2001 - 07:05:08 PST