Re: [suse-sparc] which 2.4 kernel?

From: Thorsten Kukuk (kukuk@suse.de)
Date: Sun Sep 30 2001 - 00:07:40 PDT

  • Next message: Gregory Ade: "Re: [suse-sparc] which 2.4 kernel?"

    Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 09:07:40 +0200
    From: Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk@suse.de>
    Message-ID: <20010930090740.A30167@suse.de>
    Subject: Re: [suse-sparc] which 2.4 kernel?
    

    On Sat, Sep 29, Gregory Ade wrote:

    > > Even if you get 2.4.10 compiled as SMP kernel for 32bit SPARC: It will
    > > not work.
    >
    > Are there any efforts to get 2.4.x to work on the 32-bit systems? Quite
    > honestly, it's a little disappointing to hear. I'd help if i knew anything
    > about kernel hacking. =)

    It doesn't look like there are 32-bit SPARC kernel hackers in the moment.

    > > > The SS5 has 128MB ram, 170mhz processor, runnign SuSE 7.1/sparc with the
    > > ^^^^^^
    > > Bad idea. The SS5-170MHz is known to have problems and is official not
    > > supported by the kernel hackers. If you have luck it works.
    >
    > Hmm. Where is this documented, if anywhere? If i had known this about a
    > year ago when I bought this system, I might have gone for a 100MHz version
    > instead. Is there anywhere that documents what or why the 170MHz models
    > are problematic, and/or what the problems tend to be?

    It is at least documented on the web pages from SuSE and Red Hat
    about their SPARC distribution. I don't know about Howtos and other
    sides in the moment.

      Thorsten

    -- 
    Thorsten Kukuk       http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/        kukuk@suse.de
    SuSE GmbH            Deutschherrenstr. 15-19       D-90429 Nuernberg
    --------------------------------------------------------------------    
    Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE  2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B
    

    -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 00:06:27 PDT