[suse-sparc] Binaries for Suse/Sparc

From: Jesse Lipscher (jesse@vgallery.com)
Date: Fri Apr 12 2002 - 10:27:03 PDT

Next message: Ferris McCormick: "Re: [suse-sparc] Why Solaris now...?"

Previous message: Curt Chambers: "[suse-sparc] Why Solaris now...?"
In reply to: rolf@diesing.net: "RE: [suse-sparc] Is there anybody out there?"
Next in thread: Ferris McCormick: "Re: [suse-sparc] Binaries for Suse/Sparc"
Reply: Ferris McCormick: "Re: [suse-sparc] Binaries for Suse/Sparc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

From: "Jesse Lipscher" <jesse@vgallery.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:27:03 -0400
Message-ID: <CNEOJHHPLLDBNGBNICOCCELHEOAA.jesse@vgallery.com>
Subject: [suse-sparc] Binaries for Suse/Sparc

I am new to the Suse/Sparc setup. Just got the install done on an Ultra 2
and so far I like it much better then Solaris. However, when downloading
software to install on this machine, I am usually given the following
options, Windows, Linux or Solaris. Windows is out, but the Linux versions
are usually for Intel platform Linuxes, and Solaris just doesn't seem right
either. Which way should I go... Any advice would be appreiciated, even if
it is pointing me to an FAQ or archive of past messages. Thanks.

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com

Next message: Ferris McCormick: "Re: [suse-sparc] Why Solaris now...?"
Previous message: Curt Chambers: "[suse-sparc] Why Solaris now...?"
In reply to: rolf@diesing.net: "RE: [suse-sparc] Is there anybody out there?"
Next in thread: Ferris McCormick: "Re: [suse-sparc] Binaries for Suse/Sparc"
Reply: Ferris McCormick: "Re: [suse-sparc] Binaries for Suse/Sparc"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Fri Apr 12 2002 - 10:26:59 PDT