Re: [suse-sparc] Video Card Question

From: Mike Nicewonger (twmaster_at_twmaster.com)
Date: Thu Apr 25 2002 - 12:43:31 PDT

  • Next message: Einar Bordewich: "[suse-sparc] AX1105-500, SuSE 7.3 and on-board PS/2 mouse/keyboard"

    Message-Id: <200204251941.g3PJfb421754@mail.twmaster.com>
    From: Mike Nicewonger <twmaster@twmaster.com>
    Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:43:31 -0400
    Subject: Re: [suse-sparc] Video Card Question
    

    On Thursday 25 April 2002 03:42 pm, you wrote:
    > The SX graphics are indeed supported under SuSE, and in my opinion are
    > faster than the TGX I took out. (SS20)
    >
    > RLT

    This is good information, Thank You! I should have qualified my comments by
    saying slower under Solaris.

    Mike N
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Mike Nicewonger [mailto:twmaster@twmaster.com]
    > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 3:10 PM
    > To: SuSE SPARC LIST
    > Subject: Re: [suse-sparc] Video Card Question
    >
    >
    > This is not entirely true. Only the SS20 and the extremely rare SS10-sx
    > could do this. The SS20 has a built in socket for the SX (CG-14)
    > framebuffer. This frame buffer comes in 4 and 8 MB versions. The SS10-sx
    > has a similar arrangement, however uses a different model framebuffer and
    > is not interchangable with the SS20.
    >
    > The SS5 has an option for a board called an S24 or AFX framebuffer that
    > will render 24 bit color.
    >
    > Both of these boards are quite slow in comparison to slightly newer
    > offerings from Sun in the form of Creator, PGX and Elite series graphics
    > for Ultra machines as well as slow compared to the TGX and TGX+ 8 bit
    > framebuffers.
    >
    > I do not know whether these boards, the SX or AFX are supported under SuSE
    > or Linux in general or not.
    >
    > Something to keep in mind. These machines were inteneded as workstations
    > and the SS10 was released in 1992. There was little to no need for more
    > than 8 bit color not like today where the line from a peecee to a
    > workstation is becomming blurred. Honestly unless you are surfing Pr0n an 8
    > bit display is usually satisfactory. Also, in 1992 24 bit color options
    > cost thousands of dollars.
    >
    > There are other 24 bit s-bus boards sold by Sun in the past, the CG-12 and
    > the Leo come to mind. None are presently supported. I am not even sure if
    > Solaris still supports the S24 or SX. Since the Ultra Sparc based machines
    > came out in 1995 they have focused on the Creator and PGX based
    > framebuffers and are dropping support for much of the older machines.
    >
    > More infor can be found in the Sun Framebuffer FAQ located at Sunhelp.org.
    >
    > Mike N
    >
    > on 4/25/02 10:12 AM, Witvliet, Hans at Hans.Witvliet@Alcatel.nl wrote:
    > > Hi Lou,
    > >
    > > These older Sun machines have the capability to install a special video
    > > memory board
    > > I use it in my SS20, and since then I'm no longer limited to 8-bit
    >
    > graphics
    >
    > > Sun Sparc 20 4MB VSIMM for Onboard SX graphics Sper fast 24 bit graphics
    >
    > for
    >
    > > your sparc 10 or 20
    > > They are $40-$80 on Ebay
    > >
    > > Hans
    > >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: Lou Picciano [SMTP:LouPicciano@comcast.net]
    > > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 2:50 PM
    > > To: SuSE SPARC LIST
    > > Subject: [suse-sparc] Video Card Question
    > >
    > > Dear All:
    > >
    > > As I understand it, I am limited to 8 bits of color with my GX Video
    > > card
    > > (Sparc 10) - is this true? Does anyone know which sbus cards (16?
    > > 24 bit?)
    > > have been made to work with SuSE Linux?
    > >
    > > Can anyone tell me which cards, if any, explicitly do not work??

    -- 
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com
    For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Thu Apr 25 2002 - 12:44:27 PDT