[suse-sparc] Re: Possible SPAM (accuracy low): Re: [suse-sparc] Possible SPAM (accuracy low): Freeswan and SuSE Sparc Linux

From: Ed Coates (edcoates_at_nighthawk.dyndns.org)
Date: Fri Dec 20 2002 - 17:35:08 CET

  • Next message: Block, John: "[suse-sparc] 100 Full Duplex" 
    Message-ID: <1040402108.3e0346bca3d33@nighthawk.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:35:08 -0600
From: Ed Coates <edcoates@nighthawk.dyndns.org>
Subject: [suse-sparc] Re: Possible SPAM (accuracy low): Re: [suse-sparc] Possible SPAM (accuracy low): Freeswan and SuSE Sparc Linux

    Quoting Nick Thompson <nthompso@cae.wisc.edu>:

    > > You may possibly be right about not needing the capabilities of iptables,
    > but
    > > what do I when I take your advice, and then encounter the same problems
    > when
    > > I "graduate," to 2.4?
    > >
    >
    > Stay with 2.2. I have. No problems to date. Half of my office Sparcs still
    > run 2.2 kernel. And my home firewall is still running 2.2 kernel, including
    > wireless lan support.
    >
    Thanks for the advice, and I may have to eventually do just that, but in the
    mean time, I'd really like to find a way to make it work with the 2.4 kernel if
    possible. I'm guessing that there's a problem with rsasigkey and the 32bit
    kernel associtated with 2.4. I would love to be able to dive right in and
    tackle it myself, but I'm a scripter, and not a programmer. :(

    Ed

    -------------------------------------------------
    This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ 

    -- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 20 2002 - 17:35:33 CET