RE: [suse-sparc] sun-32

rolf@diesing.net
Date: Mon Feb 18 2002 - 18:19:20 PST

  • Next message: Matthias Schulz: "Re: [suse-sparc] Sun Storage Array"

    From: <rolf@diesing.net>
    Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 03:19:20 +0100
    Message-ID: <BCEMLCNMANGFBIDLIOAJEEAMCBAA.rolf@diesing.net>
    Subject: RE: [suse-sparc] sun-32
    

    Hello Hans,
    Thorsten Kukuk says, it (2.4.x) is NOT working for sun4m, only sun4u.
    I don't know, why.
    Imho it is possible to compile it but it will NOT work correctly.
    This is something i realy know!
    I found out, a newer Kernel from Kernel.org (2.4.18preX) will work on Sun4m
    but NOT so fast like the good old 2.2.20 on SMP-Engines.
    This is something i tryed.
    The 2.4.x Kernels seem to have trouble with flushing the Caches partialy
    in SMP-Mode. ( in my Case one!!! MByte per 2 RT626-CPU's )
    In this Way Taskswitching gets very very slow and with high CPU-latency.
    (Because they flush the Caches over the Memory-Bus multiple Times per
    Seconds)
    On SingleCPU-Sparcs without CPU-Cache the 2.4.18 Kernel maybe a good Thing
    but
    in all other Situations use the stable and well _running_ 2.2.20 Kernel.
    This is what i think about.

    --- humor on ---
    (I try to imagine, what happens on Sparccenter 2000E (20 big CPU's) with
    Kernel 2.4.18, i think it will be slower than a Comodore C64 because 19
    CPU's
    try to flush Cachedata while 1 CPU do a NOP.NOP.NOP to fight against a
    BCBPCLE. ("Bugy CPU Branch Prediction Code Loading Error") .... )
    --- humor off ---

    Rolf

    --
    [EOF]
    

    > -----Original Message----- > From: Witvliet, Hans [mailto:Hans.Witvliet@Alcatel.nl] > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:38 PM > To: suse-sparc@suse.com > Subject: [suse-sparc] sun-32 > > > Hi all, > > Just a small question: the kernel provided in the 7.3 release > (linux-2.4.9-2.sparc.rpm), > is that compilable for 32-bit machines like a SS20? > > It gets me a undeclared on kbd_rate in the file vt.c > > Probably I forgot something, but I remember there was still an issue of > unmaintained sparc-32 code...... > > Hans. > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com > For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com >

    -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Mon Feb 18 2002 - 18:17:09 PST