RE: [suse-sparc] SuSE Kernel Source

rolf@diesing.net
Date: Sun Jan 13 2002 - 15:04:06 PST

  • Next message: Thorsten Kukuk: "Re: [suse-sparc] SuSE Kernel Source"

    From: <rolf@diesing.net>
    Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:04:06 +0100
    Message-ID: <BCEMLCNMANGFBIDLIOAJAEMECAAA.rolf@diesing.net>
    Subject: RE: [suse-sparc] SuSE Kernel Source
    

    Hihi...
    this may be an Answer, why i am not able to patch a Suse 2.4.14 to 2.4.15!

    Look at the Thread:
    "A _wonderfull_ Distribution. Thanx SUSE!"
    I'm asking Thorsten Kukuk on Mon, Jan 07 about this and he say:

    >On Mon, Jan 07, rolf@diesing.net wrote:

    >> Yes... may be... I am _now_ confused...
    >> because the last full Week (i tried to setup a well running SuSE-Linux on
    a
    >> Sparc) is gone without any success!
    >>
    >> Tell me an the other People on the Bord, why is it not possible to fix
    >> errors in Your Kernel (2.4.14) with official Kernel Patches. And take a
    look
    >> into the Kernel-changelogs and ask this Question again, please!
    >
    >I think you are using a SS10? For this we don't ship a 2.4 kernel, only
    >2.2.20.
    >
    >So we ship 3 kernel sources:
    >2.2.20 for 32bit SPARC (which is 2.2.20aaX)
    >2.4.14 for 64bit UltraSPARC
    >And a plain 2.4.xx vanilla kernel for people who wish to patch
    >the kernel.
    >
    >And yes, you will always find a newer kernel which has bug fixed
    >and new bugs introduced. When we make the master, our 2.4.14 was
    >far the stablest one from all possible solutions.
    >And it is possible to fix our kernels with official kernel fixes.
    >
    > Thorsten

    You can reread this at some days ago in this list.
    And now the most important Question:

    Who is wrong now and what is the Truth?

    Rolf

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Ed Coates [mailto:ewcoate@nighthawk.dyndns.org]
    > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 6:15 PM
    > To: suse-sparc@suse.com
    > Subject: [suse-sparc] SuSE Kernel Source
    >
    >
    > Just a quick question if anyone can answer it. Why does SuSE which with a
    > default 2.4.14 kernel for sparc, but when you grab the kernel-source.spm,
    > it builds for linux-2.4.10.SuSE? Furthermore, why does the package list
    > linux-2.4.10.tar.bz2, when in fact, if you install it, it doesn't, and you
    > have to go to ftp.kernel.org and get it?
    >
    > Just a little bit of wondering on my part. Hope that someone can answer.
    >
    > Ed
    >
    >
    > --
    > To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com
    > For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com
    >

    -- 
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com
    For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Sun Jan 13 2002 - 15:02:21 PST