Re: [suse-sparc] SuSE Kernel Source

From: Thorsten Kukuk (kukuk@suse.de)
Date: Mon Jan 14 2002 - 07:44:54 PST

  • Next message: Ingo T. Storm: "Re: [suse-sparc] SuSE Kernel Source"

    Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 16:44:54 +0100
    From: Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk@suse.de>
    Message-ID: <20020114164454.A21967@suse.de>
    Subject: Re: [suse-sparc] SuSE Kernel Source
    

    On Mon, Jan 14, rolf@diesing.net wrote:

    > >kernel-source-sparc32 -> 2.2.20aaX with fixes for sparc32
    >
    > witch is not ready for patching, only for "bugfixing"
    > This Kernel can be compiled on 32-Bit-Sparc and its running.
    > Many Errors (in NFS, RPC, Code in arch/Sparc, many more) are
    > not fixed but SMP is working (not very fast).

    Which are not fixed? Somebody asked you already for this, but you
    didn't answer.
    At the time I made the release, there where no open bugs, and after
    this I didn't read about any serious problem.

    > But please look inside the Mail from Ingo T. Storm, he says
    > at So 13.01.2002 10:45 in this Thread:
    >
    > >I have about 10 sparc32 machines here, all running 2.4 kernels. But they
    > are
    > >all SS5/SS10/SS20, i.e. sun4m, the ss2 should be "sun4c". Furthermore on
    > >sparclinux there was another report of a sun4c not booting a late 2.4
    > >kernel.
    >
    > Why is he able to compile/run 2.4.x on sparc32 (sun4m) and not me?

    If you can answer this question, you found the bug a lot of people
    are searching on since a long time.

      Thorsten

    -- 
    Thorsten Kukuk       http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/        kukuk@suse.de
    SuSE GmbH            Deutschherrenstr. 15-19       D-90429 Nuernberg
    --------------------------------------------------------------------    
    Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE  2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B
    

    -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Mon Jan 14 2002 - 07:43:06 PST