Re: [suse-sparc] SuSE Kernel Source

From: Ingo T. Storm (suse-sparc@computerbild.de)
Date: Mon Jan 14 2002 - 07:55:49 PST

  • Next message: Eduardo A. Suarez: "Re: [suse-sparc] SuSE Kernel Source"

    Message-ID: <017901c19d13$efc7e940$7400a8c0@dukat.cb.de>
    From: "Ingo T. Storm" <suse-sparc@computerbild.de>
    Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 16:55:49 +0100
    Subject: Re: [suse-sparc] SuSE Kernel Source
    

    >But please look inside the Mail from Ingo T. Storm, he says
    >at So 13.01.2002 10:45 in this Thread:
    >
    >>I have about 10 sparc32 machines here, all running 2.4 kernels.

    >Why is he able to compile/run 2.4.x on sparc32 (sun4m) and not me?

    probably bacause you use a different toolchain AND/OR use different
    options of the kernel than I do. The machines I use in production are
    lightweight firewalls and/or http, ftp and dns servers. No heavy
    filesystem useage, no fancy filesystems (no ext3, reiserfs, lvm,
    whatever, just plain ext2). They all run very reliably with kernels
    later that 2.4.15-pre2.

    As for the toolchain: please post which gcc/kgcc/modutils/binutils you
    are using. Esp. the binutils requirement has changed lately.

    >This is no Reason for Ed's Problems on running the 2.4.18pre because
    my Box
    >(sun4m) crashed in the same Way like Ed's.

    Ed's is still crashing without LVM. The kernel that boots and runs
    fine on my sparc32 (at least recompiles itself cleanly) doesn't boot
    on his ss2.

    I'd happily send you a 2.4.17-smp and tell you if it runs here you
    send my your desired .config.

    Ingo

    -- 
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com
    For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Mon Jan 14 2002 - 07:55:13 PST