RE: [suse-sparc] 7.3 on Ultra 10 Elite3D

From: Witvliet, Hans (Hans.Witvliet@Alcatel.nl)
Date: Wed Jan 16 2002 - 02:33:00 PST

  • Next message: Mike Nicewonger: "Re: [suse-sparc] HD for SS20"

    Message-ID: <03273D4BC7F4D511AC440008C7E6F881542089@nlntmail2b.ats.nld.alcatel.nl>
    From: "Witvliet, Hans" <Hans.Witvliet@Alcatel.nl>
    Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:33:00 +0100
    Subject: RE: [suse-sparc] 7.3 on Ultra 10 Elite3D
    

    Hi Scott,

    I partly agree,

    Firstly let me state, that I am very content with Suse.
    Certainly they can not follow every kernel change. If some wants the real
    bleeding edge, take the source from kernel.org.
    Problem is however that the vanilla code from kernel.org does not work for
    sparc-32 (a.f.a.i.k.)
    So than it its either 2.2.x code or finding out which patches should be or
    not be applied to get a working 2.4.x/2.5.x kernel working again. (in the
    assumption that these patches are openly available).

    As the latest message about sun-32 was that it might (!) work, and as there
    is still no official sparc-32-kernel-code maintainer, I wonder if it is even
    safe to use the 2.4.14 code from the 7.3 release....
    Untill I hear otherwise, I would advise to stick with 2.2.19, (at least for
    important machines).

    Hans

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Scott A Micciche [SMTP:scottmicciche@sbcglobal.net]
            Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:48 PM
            To: Till Jaeger
            Cc: suse-sparc@suse.com
            Subject: Re: [suse-sparc] 7.3 on Ultra 10 Elite3D

            I have to agree. SuSE is the only distribution I see out there
            providing us with a quality kernel for sun boxes. They have
    provided
            2.4.14 with 7.3. If a user wants a newer kernel, he/she will have
    to go
            on their own until SuSE provides a supported upgrade. Linux is too
    much
            on the bleeding edge for a comapny to jump on every (daily?) kernel
            update. Unless there's some drastic mission critical need for a
    newer
            kernel than 2.4.14, I would highly recommend sticking with the
    provided
            kernel and it's source. I've had no trouble re-compiling a
    monolithic
            kernel with the provided sources. Also, the 2.4.x series defaults
    to
            ultrasparc cpus and the 2.2.x series for the sun4c and 4m machines.
            Thanks SuSE for the excellent support.

            Scott

            On
            Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Till Jaeger wrote:

    > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 13:05:20 +0100
    > From: Till Jaeger <till.jaeger@epost.de>
    > To: suse-sparc@suse.com
    > Subject: [suse-sparc] 7.3 on Ultra 10 Elite3D
    >
    > Hi Guys,
    >
    > i've read some unkindly discussions here the last days, so all i
    want to say is
    > thank you SuSE.
    > I have installed 7.3 on my new Ultra 10 and it works great.
    > Even my Elite3D and the additional SCSI Adaptor was recognized.
    > It works stable and fast - i love it.
    >
    > cheers, Till
    >
    >
    > --
    > To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com
    > For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com
    >

            I have never understood the female capacity to avoid a direct answer
    to
            any question.
                            -- Spock, "This Side of Paradise", stardate 3417.3

            --
            To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com
            For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com

    -- 
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com
    For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Wed Jan 16 2002 - 02:34:28 PST