From: <rolf@diesing.net> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 14:14:26 +0100 Message-ID: <BCEMLCNMANGFBIDLIOAJOENACAAA.rolf@diesing.net> Subject: RE: [suse-sparc] 7.3 on Ultra 10 Elite3D
Yes, this describes the Facts and the Problem, i argree with you.
Rolf
-- [EOF]> -----Original Message----- > From: Witvliet, Hans [mailto:Hans.Witvliet@Alcatel.nl] > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:33 AM > To: 'Scott Micciche' > Cc: suse-sparc@suse.com > Subject: RE: [suse-sparc] 7.3 on Ultra 10 Elite3D > > > Hi Scott, > > I partly agree, > > Firstly let me state, that I am very content with Suse. > Certainly they can not follow every kernel change. If some wants the real > bleeding edge, take the source from kernel.org. > Problem is however that the vanilla code from kernel.org does not work for > sparc-32 (a.f.a.i.k.) > So than it its either 2.2.x code or finding out which patches should be or > not be applied to get a working 2.4.x/2.5.x kernel working again. (in the > assumption that these patches are openly available). > > As the latest message about sun-32 was that it might (!) work, > and as there > is still no official sparc-32-kernel-code maintainer, I wonder if > it is even > safe to use the 2.4.14 code from the 7.3 release.... > Untill I hear otherwise, I would advise to stick with 2.2.19, (at > least for > important machines). >
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Wed Jan 16 2002 - 05:14:25 PST