Message-Id: <200201180913.g0I9DWX28694@bjork.inria.fr> From: Aurelian Lavric <aurelian.lavric@inria.fr> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 10:13:31 +0100 Subject: Re: [suse-sparc] Compiling C++ on 7.3 on an Ultra 10.
rpm if I remember right has a --target option. On my Suse.sparc I've compiled
rpm4.1 and now I'm ussing a --target that gives me something like -m32
-mcpu=ultrasparc (I don't remember exactly the target, but I think you can
always use sparc32; it is possible that I've used a ultrasparc target, but
for the exact configuration of targets you should see the rpm configuration
file "rpmrc", found in /usr/lib/rpm in my compiled configuration). That's the
best optimization you can get for a ultrasparc. The lake of -m64 support is
because there are no libraries, neither distros that uses lib64 set of
libraries (I never tried a 64 distro, but I know that there were some in the
past, not working too well because of lake of support for 64bit in some 3rd
party applications).
On Saturday 12 January 2002 01:58, you wrote:
> On Friday 11 January 2002 01:27 am, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, Lamar Owen wrote:
> > > PostgreSQL 7.2beta doesn't exhibit the problem, so something is being
> > > done differently now -- the problem exhibited itself with 7.1.3 as
> > > patched and built by the SuSE-provided spec file.
> >
> > Could be, we always use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS in the spec files. But as
> > already written: "sparc32 rpm -ba <spec file>" works.
>
> Actually, that's not what was written -- but now I see the light, and can
> make this thing rebuild. Good. Many thanks.
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 01:13:53 PST