RE: [suse-sparc] Will there be a SuSE 8.0 for Sparc?

From: IT3 Stuart Blake Tener, USNR-R (stuart@bh90210.net)
Date: Tue Mar 12 2002 - 11:39:08 PST

  • Next message: Anthony Moulen: "Re: [suse-sparc] Will there be a SuSE 8.0 for Sparc?"

    Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 11:39:08 -0800
    From: "IT3 Stuart Blake Tener, USNR-R" <stuart@bh90210.net>
    Message-id: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA6nohIbvp0RGXqACAx8VP1sKAAAAQAAAAtaHZrUOYz0aI3HL3EgsCFAEAAAAA@bh90210.net>
    Subject: RE: [suse-sparc] Will there be a SuSE 8.0 for Sparc?
    

    Mr. Walker:

            Let me respond to several things you mentioned. It should be
    pointed out that a derivative work (under US law) is not defined by the
    GPL, but is defined by the courts and legislation enacted. You may wish
    to think that the GPL is this god like entity ruling the free software
    world, but it is not, it is merely a licensing agreement. And no
    licensing agreement can subvert legislative enactment or the rulings of
    the courts (at least not in the US legal system). So a derivative work
    is still defined by those entities.

            Secondly I never said that running a non-GPL application on a
    GPL OS made your binary GPL, you said that, not me.

            Lastly "reaching" as you put it, is also known as case law. Case
    law is what courts historically follow. Once a case has defined opinion
    and it has been accepted as good law, then other courts will try to rule
    with the same logic in mind. That is where this idea of derivative work
    comes from not wishful thinking, not the spirit of the GPL, and not what
    we think, but what has been done historically already in the courts.

            It ought also be pointed out that I am not made sick by YAST, I
    was only trying to say that I am willing to pay to purchase the SPARC
    version of SuSE because they place the ISO images of the binaries and
    source on the web (ftp) or have clearly allowed others to do it. This
    IS in the spirit of the GPL, creating a FUD factor for other (not SuSE)
    to distribute SuSE binaries with YAST inclusive thereto, in my view, is
    not in the spirit of the GPL.

            I am unwilling to support the I386 version of SuSE since they
    work (as I have been told) to retard efforts of people to place bootable
    binary ISOs of I386 version on even private ftp or websites with YAST
    inclusive thereto. However, I do not make any effort to stop my clients
    if they plan to use it. I was only referring to where the money I earn
    goes.

            I also was trying to resolve a problem with the Happy Meal
    Ethernet driver, which everyone seems to say now, is a problem in the
    kernel. So as soon as I figure out who to submit the bug to via email, I
    will do so.

            I did not mean to upset anyone, only to express my opinions with
    regard to what I feel ought be considered or at least heard by others in
    regard to how SuSE distributed I386 Linux.

    Very Respectfully,

    Stuart Blake Tener, IT3 (E-4), USNR-R, N3GWG
    Beverly Hills, California
    VTU 1904G (Volunteer Training Unit)
    stuart@bh90210.net
    west coast: (310)-358-0202 P.O. Box 16043, Beverly Hills, CA 90209-2043
    east coast: (215)-338-6005 P.O. Box 45859, Philadelphia, PA 19149-5859

    Telecopier: (419)-715-6073 fax to email gateway via www.efax.com (it's
    free!)

    JOIN THE US NAVY RESERVE, SERVE YOUR COUNTRY, AND BENEFIT FROM IT ALL.

    Tuesday, March 12, 2002 10:43 AM

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Damond Walker [mailto:dwalker@syncreticsoft.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 10:27 AM
    To: suse-sparc@suse.com
    Subject: Re: [suse-sparc] Will there be a SuSE 8.0 for Sparc?

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "IT3 Stuart Blake Tener, USNR-R" <stuart@bh90210.net>

    [...snip...]

    > I would please request that you tell me from where you get this
    > information that source code must be duplicated to be a derivative
    work?
    > I am curious how much time you have studied this issue? I know that I
    > have spent a fair amount of time researching in the past for a law
    > student, so I am not speaking from a position absent references.
    >

    The GPL seems quite clear as to what it defines as a derivative.
    Assuming
    YAST hasn't been statically linked to any GPL'ed code then SuSE should
    be
    free to do whatever it would like with YAST -- that includes not
    distributing sourcecode.

    Running a non-GPL application on a GPL'ed OS does not make your binary
    GPL.

    That is the spirit of the GPL. Until it's *really* tested in court
    (somewhere) we can't say for certain.....until that time I think you're
    reaching.

    And until that time, if YAST is making you this sick, I suggest moving
    over
    to Debian/SPARC and leaving the rest of us alone.

    Damond

    -- 
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com
    For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com
    

    -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Tue Mar 12 2002 - 11:38:00 PST