[suse-sparc] gcc 3.1

From: Scott A Micciche (scottmicciche_at_sbcglobal.net)
Date: Fri May 17 2002 - 04:20:11 CEST

Next message: Stefan Gofferje: "[suse-sparc] Haltet mich bitte nicht fuer bloed - EInstellungen zum Brennen der Sparc ISOs mit nero"

Previous message: Lou Picciano: "Re: [suse-sparc] more parts"
Next in thread: Brad Mattick: "Re: [suse-sparc] gcc 3.1"
Reply: Brad Mattick: "Re: [suse-sparc] gcc 3.1"
Reply: Thorsten Kukuk: "Re: [suse-sparc] gcc 3.1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 19:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Scott A Micciche <scottmicciche@sbcglobal.net>
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205161918550.9955-100000@phobos.moons.net>
Subject: [suse-sparc] gcc 3.1

With the release of gcc 3.1 today, I noticed that sparc 64 support is
enabled and supported. Does this mean that we can get rid of the egcs64
compiler and just have one compiler for the suse sparc? Is it possible to
cleanly compile 64 bit code in the linux sparc 64 bit kernels? thaks in
advance for any information.

Scott

A copy of the universe is not what is required of art; one of the
damned things is ample.
-- Rebecca West

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com

Next message: Stefan Gofferje: "[suse-sparc] Haltet mich bitte nicht fuer bloed - EInstellungen zum Brennen der Sparc ISOs mit nero"
Previous message: Lou Picciano: "Re: [suse-sparc] more parts"
Next in thread: Brad Mattick: "Re: [suse-sparc] gcc 3.1"
Reply: Brad Mattick: "Re: [suse-sparc] gcc 3.1"
Reply: Thorsten Kukuk: "Re: [suse-sparc] gcc 3.1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Fri May 17 2002 - 04:20:17 CEST