Re: [suse-sparc] gcc 3.1

From: Brad Mattick (bradmattick_at_yahoo.com)
Date: Fri May 17 2002 - 19:29:41 CEST

  • Next message: Stefan Gofferje: "Re: [suse-sparc] Haltet mich bitte nicht fuer bloed - EInstellungen zum Brennen der Sparc ISOs mit nero" 

    Message-ID: <20020517172941.15719.qmail@web12703.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 10:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Brad Mattick <bradmattick@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [suse-sparc] gcc 3.1

    I just used 3.1 to build kernel 2.4.18 and it worked.
    That's a 64 bit application. I haven't tried testing
    any end user programs yet.

    -Brad
    --- Scott A Micciche <scottmicciche@sbcglobal.net>
    wrote:
    > With the release of gcc 3.1 today, I noticed that
    > sparc 64 support is
    > enabled and supported. Does this mean that we can
    > get rid of the egcs64
    > compiler and just have one compiler for the suse
    > sparc? Is it possible to
    > cleanly compile 64 bit code in the linux sparc 64
    > bit kernels? thaks in
    > advance for any information.
    >
    > Scott
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > A copy of the universe is not what is required of
    > art; one of the
    > damned things is ample.
    > -- Rebecca West
    >
    >
    > --
    > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
    > suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com
    > For additional commands, e-mail:
    > suse-sparc-help@suse.com
    >

    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
    http://launch.yahoo.com 

    -- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com
For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.0 : Fri May 17 2002 - 19:30:25 CEST