From: pierre granier (pierre.granier5_at_wanadoo.fr)
Date: Fri Feb 27 2004 - 20:20:41 CET
Message-ID: <403F9889.7000007@wanadoo.fr> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 20:20:41 +0100 From: pierre granier <pierre.granier5@wanadoo.fr> Subject: Re: [suse-sparc] Watchout ...
too much too big work! For me in ether case!
Why not aurora , debian, mandrake, debian?
Alvaro Figueroa wrote:
> Mensaje citado por Dave Lee <dblee@daves-domain.net>:
>
>> I'm still not sure I really will need the 2.4 kernel but I
>> do plan to try installing Suse 7.3 and maybe Debian 3.0.
>
>
> If it's SMP, it won't do even a bit well with kernel 2.4. And 2.6 work
> is on the
> way, but it will take quite a while.
>
>> If everything
>> works OK I'll probably stick with Suse since not sure I want to take
>> the time to learn the "debian way" even though I'm sure its very good.
>
>
> BTW, are there enou'f of you guys who would really like to use SuSE on
> sparcs?
> If yes, then why don't you guys start a more current SuSE port for sparc
> as the
> guys from Aurora (RH) and the guys from Splack (Slackware) have done?
>
> --
> Alvaro Figueroa
> (who _hates_ having to test this webmail)
>
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: suse-sparc-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, e-mail: suse-sparc-help@suse.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri Feb 27 2004 - 20:20:46 CET