From: Chris Schlaeger (cs_at_suse.de)
Date: Wed Nov 05 2003 - 13:10:36 CET
From: Chris Schlaeger <cs@suse.de> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 13:10:36 +0100 Message-Id: <200311051310.43885.cs@suse.de> Subject: Re: [taskjuggler-devel] Suggestion
Hi Dick,
On Friday 31 October 2003 09:23, Dick Kniep wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Thanks for your answer,
>
> On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 12:07, Chris Schlaeger wrote:
> > I've thought about more genering per time unit limits before.
> > Unfortunately such limits slow down the current scheduling algorithm a
> > lot. There are ways around this, but it is a bit more complex. But this
> > is already on my list.
>
> Currently I am trying to get around this by programmatically adding
> vacations per week that consume the required hours. Off course this is a
> rough work-around.
>
> But I don't know if that collides with manual vactions that are put in
> the system. (Is that so?, or differently put, can I have overlapping
> vactions for a resource?)
I guess that won't work. Vacations may not overlap. It would be possible to
allow overlapping vacation but this would require some more intrusive changes
than I want to make before the upcoming 2.0 release. I can look after 2.0
into this again.
Chris
-- KDE 3.1: Conquer your Enterprise Desktop! See http://www.kde.org! GPG Key: 1024D/0500838B A5FE C051 2AFC 9A14 768A 5125 5829 5750 0500 838B
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Nov 05 2003 - 15:58:09 CET