From: Dick Kniep (dick_at_kniep.nl)
Date: Fri Oct 31 2003 - 09:23:13 CET
From: Dick Kniep <dick@kniep.nl> Date: 31 Oct 2003 09:23:13 +0100 Message-Id: <1067588593.19084.3.camel@server.kniep.nl> Subject: Re: [taskjuggler-devel] Suggestion
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your answer,
On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 12:07, Chris Schlaeger wrote:
>
> I've thought about more genering per time unit limits before. Unfortunately
> such limits slow down the current scheduling algorithm a lot. There are ways
> around this, but it is a bit more complex. But this is already on my list.
Currently I am trying to get around this by programmatically adding
vacations per week that consume the required hours. Off course this is a
rough work-around.
But I don't know if that collides with manual vactions that are put in
the system. (Is that so?, or differently put, can I have overlapping
vactions for a resource?)
Any other suggestions?
>
> Chris
>
> --
> KDE 3.1: Conquer your Enterprise Desktop! See http://www.kde.org!
> GPG Key: 1024D/0500838B A5FE C051 2AFC 9A14 768A 5125 5829 5750 0500 838B
-- To unsubscribe, email: taskjuggler-devel-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, email: taskjuggler-devel-help@suse.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri Oct 31 2003 - 09:16:46 CET