From: Dick Kniep (dick_at_kniep.nl)
Date: Thu Jun 03 2004 - 16:52:11 CEST
From: Dick Kniep <dick@kniep.nl> Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 16:52:11 +0200 Message-Id: <200406031652.11370.dick@kniep.nl> Subject: Re: [taskjuggler-devel] karm integration?
On Thursday 03 June 2004 14:27, Mark Bucciarelli schreef:
> I would imagine that task juggler would need to lock the file for it's
> entire processing. Once done, any apps connected to it would be signaled
> that the file had changed and they would update their displays.
How would you know which applications to signal?
>
> I don't see why this wouldn't work for multi-user access. It's much easier
> than writing a server and is also easier to install and use.
You could be right here, however there should always be some control on the
execution of TJ, because you could get weird results if more than one person
requests TJ to plan.
Needs more thinking thru anyway
>
> [BTW -- Currently, Karm does not take advantage of this nice
> functionality--it rather stupidly locks the file on open and holds that
> lock until it closes. But this will change ...]
>
> And if the order of how things are written to the file is important, this
> seems like it could (should?) be implemented in the resource layer.
Cheers,
Dick
-- To unsubscribe, email: taskjuggler-devel-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, email: taskjuggler-devel-help@suse.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Thu Jun 03 2004 - 16:52:47 CEST