From: Chris Schlaeger (cs_at_suse.de)
Date: Tue Nov 02 2004 - 21:41:57 CET
From: Chris Schlaeger <cs@suse.de> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 21:41:57 +0100 Message-Id: <200411022142.06163.cs@suse.de> Subject: Re: [taskjuggler-devel] sub-task priority ignored?
Hi Brian,
On Friday 29 October 2004 23:54, Brian Mcminn wrote:
> Attached is a very short taskjuggler input file. I have assigned a
> priority of 1000 to blurf.baz and have assigned the same resource to
> all tasks.
>
> I would expect the tasks to be scheduled in the order
> blurf.bar
> blurf.baz
> foo.bar
> foo.baz
> but they are scheduled in the order
> foo.bar
> foo.baz
> blurf.bar
> blurf.baz
>
> If I make the entire blurf task priority 1000, I get the expected
> result.
this is the intended behavior. TJ schedules from the beginning of the
dependency chain towards the end. foo.bar and blurf.bar have the same
priority and the same resource assignments. "Priority" is only a measurement
for the task relative to the task going on at the same time. It's not
intended to specify that one task should start earlier than another. You need
to use depends/precedes for this. If you really want blurf to start before
foor, then make foo depend on blurf.
Chris
-- KDE 3.2: Conquer your Enterprise Desktop! See http://www.kde.org! GPG Key: 1024D/0500838B A5FE C051 2AFC 9A14 768A 5125 5829 5750 0500 838B
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Nov 03 2004 - 13:42:40 CET