From: Álvaro Falquina Garrido (afalquina_at_mac.com)
Date: Tue Nov 09 2004 - 18:34:44 CET
Message-Id: <A4BFFDF5-3275-11D9-A81C-000A95AD0B94@mac.com> From: Álvaro Falquina Garrido <afalquina@mac.com> Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 18:34:44 +0100 Subject: Re: [taskjuggler-devel] Accented characters (was: *** Request via TaskJuggler Web Site ***)
Hi,
In my version of tjx2gantt, (1.3?) the problem seems to be that,
although iso-latin1 fonts are defined, the standard adobe-encoded fonts
are used instead. Maybe whenever something like
$p->setfont("Times-Roman", 12) is called,
$p->setfont("Times-Roman-iso", 12) should be called instead.
Regards,
Álvaro
On 9 de nov de 2004, at 12.26 pm, Nicolas Girard wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 November 2004 11:36, Joachim Werner wrote:
>> Hi!
>
> Hi Joachim,
> thanks for your quick answers !
>
>>
>>> First one: tjx2gantt doesn\'t handle accentued characters well using
>>> the
>>> latest cvs version ; would you please tell me how to overcome this ?
>>
>> What exactly is the problem? Missing UTF-8 support? We've lately
>> started
>> to use tjx2gantt again, so there might be hope for this one ...
>>
> Actually when tasks names have accented characteds, they get well
> displayed on
> html reports, but badly displayed in eps fogures generated with
> tjx2gantt.
>
> I did a quick comparison between the postscript code generated by
> tjx2gantt
> and a single line of text turned to ps using a2ps, and strangely
> enough, the
> characters seem to be written the same way (e.g. \350 or \351). There
> are
> differences in the way Latin1 fonts are defined (or "Reencoded", or
> whatever). Thus it seems to be more related to Postscript::Simple than
> to
> tjx2gantt itself, though I couldn't tell much more as I'm not familiar
> with
> this stuff :-(
>
>
>>> Second problem: I found it quite boring to have to specify dates
>>> multiple
>>> times (inside and multiple reports), so I thought it made sense to
>>> write
>>> something like:
>>>
>>> macro debut [2004-10-18];
>>> project proj \"My Project\" \"1.0\" ${debut} 2005-01-01 {
>>> ...
>>> }
>>>
>>> but it seems to be impossible with the current file format. What do
>>> you
>>> think ? Could it be implemented ?
>>
>> We are doing this all the time. I think there just is a syntax error
>> somewhere in your example (e.g. the ";" is not supposed to be there)
>> ...
>>
>
> Oh, okay ; so perhaps you could correct the related documentation page
> (http://www.taskjuggler.org/manual/property_macro.html) on which the
> given
> example shows a ';' ? At least it was misleading to me...
>
>
> Cheers,
> Nicolas
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, email: taskjuggler-devel-unsubscribe@suse.com
> For additional commands, email: taskjuggler-devel-help@suse.com
>
-- To unsubscribe, email: taskjuggler-devel-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands, email: taskjuggler-devel-help@suse.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Tue Nov 09 2004 - 18:35:54 CET