Re: [taskjuggler] A Question or a feature request

From: Bombadil (listacorreo_at_ya.com)
Date: Tue Feb 04 2003 - 21:00:33 CET

  • Next message: Chris Schlaeger: "Re: [taskjuggler] A Question or a feature request"
    From: Bombadil <listacorreo@ya.com>
    Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 21:00:33 +0100
    Message-Id: <200302042100.33490.listacorreo@ya.com>
    Subject: Re: [taskjuggler] A Question or a feature request
    

    Ok , it's a solution that avoid the loose of visibility ,
    anyway I'll have to write qiute a lot ... welll until now
    it's the best solution.

    Thanks.

    Hgb.

    El Lunes, 3 de Febrero de 2003 15:45, Chris Schlaeger escribió:
    > Hi,
    >
    > On Saturday 01 February 2003 00:22, Bombadil wrote:
    > > Hi,
    > > I am starting to use taskjuggler and I really like it.
    >
    > glad to hear this.
    >
    > > Actually I have to schelude a new project , and I am using its data to
    > > practise with taskjuggler.
    > >
    > > One of the problems I use to have is , for example , suppose I have two
    > > tasks (A&B) , and the second (B) depends from the first (A) , but supose
    > > the second task can start when the first task reach 50% of realization.
    > >
    > > The only way I have to represent it (I think) is to divide the fisrt
    > > task in two tasks (A1&A2) , and make second task (B) depends from the
    > > first part (A1) of the first task (A).
    > >
    > > ... I don't know it's clear , well the problem is that this happens
    > > habitually and I use to work with a lot of tasks , so I have to divide
    > > too much tasks and the project loose visibility and clarity.
    > >
    > > The question is , Does exist an easy way to define such "relative" or
    > > "soft" dependencies with taskjuggler? , and if not , Don't you think it
    > > could be an interesting feature for taskjuggler?
    >
    > There is no concept of soft dependencies in TJ and there are no plans to
    > add it. If I understand you correctly you have really a situation like
    > this:
    >
    > task a1 "A1" {
    > }
    >
    > task a2 "A2" {
    > }
    >
    > task b "B" {
    > depends !a1
    > }
    >
    > But you don't want to crowd your reports with A1/A2 instead of A. A
    > possible solution would be
    >
    > task a "A" {
    > flag hideDetails
    > task a1 "A1" {
    > }
    > task a2 "A2" {
    > }
    > }
    >
    > task b "B" {
    > depends !a.a1
    > }
    >
    > htmltaskreport "foo.html" {
    > rolluptask hideDetails
    > }
    >
    > This way you would have all the information in your project plan but your
    > reports still don't look too crowded. Of course it's a little bit of
    > writing work, but you might be able to use some macros.
    >
    > Chris
    >
    > --
    > KDE 3.1: Conquer your Enterprise Desktop!
    > http://www.kde.org

    -- 
    To unsubscribe, email the address listed in the List-Unsubscribe header
    For additional commands, email: taskjuggler-help@suse.com
    

  • Next message: Chris Schlaeger: "Re: [taskjuggler] A Question or a feature request"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Tue Feb 04 2003 - 20:56:48 CET