From: Pascal Drabik (Pascal.Drabik_at_easynet.be)
Date: Tue Oct 28 2003 - 21:15:14 CET
Message-ID: <3F9ECE52.5000407@easynet.be> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:15:14 +0100 From: Pascal Drabik <Pascal.Drabik@easynet.be> Subject: Re: [taskjuggler] Taskjuggler problem?
Dear Chris,
Thanks a lot for your answer.
I was using indeed 1.4.2. The CVS snapshot seems to work perfectly.
Thanks a lot for your help and your contribution.
I am actually a SuSE customer since the version V5.3.
Regards,
Pascal.
Chris Schlaeger wrote:
>> I get the same result if I use "duration" instead of "length".
>>
>>
>
>What version of TJ are you using?
>
>The current CVS results in a 1 hour allocation no matter whether I use length,
>effort or duration. This is what I would expect.
>
>
>
>> I get what I expect if I use "effort". But this is not really what I
>>want to mdelise
>>(e.g. if 2 persons are involved, then the allocation is divided by 2).
>>
>> I tried several possibilities but did not find any explanation.
>>
>> Is there something that I do wrong in the specification or is it a bug?
>>
>>
>
>Maybe a bug in your version. Try the current CVS snapshot, please.
>
>Chris
>
>
>
-- To unsubscribe, email the address listed in the List-Unsubscribe header For additional commands, email: taskjuggler-help@suse.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Tue Oct 28 2003 - 21:12:23 CET