From: Max Hofer (max.hofer_at_apus.co.at)
Date: Wed Sep 29 2004 - 16:48:20 CEST
From: Max Hofer <max.hofer@apus.co.at> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:48:20 +0200 Message-Id: <200409291648.20610.max.hofer@apus.co.at> Subject: [taskjuggler] Sharing mutex resources between employees
I wrote a simple project file which shares two resources (proto types) between
3 employees.
My problems are:
1) I set the efficiency of the "protoTypes" resources to 0. I found no other
way. limits, maxeffort etc.) produce an error message claiming i can not set
the value to 0.
the duration of the report shows me "wrong" values. Staff working hours show
me 32 hours/day instead of 16 - which in theory is right because the proto
types consume 16 hours (with efficiency 0).
What i want is the proto types not producing any effort.
Is there an easier way for my problem?
2) I allocated the resources for a task in the following way:
-------- code snippet start ----------
# This means we want allocate employee 1 using one of the two prototypes
allocate protoType1 {
mandatory
alternative protoType2
}
allocate empl1
-------- code snippet end ----------
Writing it in the reverse order i get a slightly different output (check the
html files):
-------- code snippet start ----------
# This means we want allocate employee 1 using one of the two prototypes
allocate empl1
allocate protoType1 {
mandatory
alternative protoType2
}
-------- code snippet end ----------
Since both proto types have efficiency 0, the order in which i allocate the
resources should not have any influence on the outcome.
Is this a bug?
mfg Max
-- To unsubscribe, email the address listed in the List-Unsubscribe header For additional commands, email: taskjuggler-help@suse.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Sep 29 2004 - 16:48:51 CEST