[taskjuggler] Re: project enddate

From: Chris Schlaeger (cs_at_kde.org)
Date: Fri Dec 16 2005 - 17:06:48 CET

• Next message: Brian Mcminn: "[taskjuggler] reported effort vs. weeklymax limits"
• Previous message: karl42: "[taskjuggler] project enddate"
• In reply to: karl42: "[taskjuggler] project enddate"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

From: Chris Schlaeger <cs@kde.org>
Message-ID: <18aa.43a2e617@www.taskjuggler.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:06:48 +0100 (CET)
Subject: [taskjuggler] Re: project enddate

It's ok to set an end date far in the future. It will increase memory consumption and in certain cases runtime though. So don't set it too far in the future. Usually the project time frame stabilizes after the initial planning phase and rarely needs to be adjusted.

Chris

--
TaskJuggler Developer
-- 
To unsubscribe, email the address listed in the List-Unsubscribe header
For additional commands, email: taskjuggler-help@suse.com

• Next message: Brian Mcminn: "[taskjuggler] reported effort vs. weeklymax limits"
• Previous message: karl42: "[taskjuggler] project enddate"
• In reply to: karl42: "[taskjuggler] project enddate"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Fri Dec 16 2005 - 17:06:50 CET