From: Ulrich Hammel (hammel_at_nutechsolutions.de)
Date: Mon Feb 14 2005 - 14:42:30 CET
Message-ID: <4210AAC6.7020309@nutechsolutions.de> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:42:30 +0100 From: Ulrich Hammel <hammel@nutechsolutions.de> Subject: [Fwd: Re: [taskjuggler] ktjview2 and taskjuggler producing different schedules]
Chris,
I guess both schedules are correct in the sense that they do not violate
any constraints. But the output of taskjuggler (as shown in the
xml-output) better meets a desirable schedule that I tried to tune by
use of task priorities. Therefore I make use of the taskjuggler output
for planning my projects.
Uli
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [taskjuggler] ktjview2 and taskjuggler producing different
schedules
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 21:54:19 +0100
From: Chris Schlaeger <cs@suse.de>
Reply-To: cs@suse.de
Organization: SuSE Linux AG
To: taskjuggler@suse.com
CC: Ulrich Hammel <hammel@nutechsolutions.de>
References: <420B22E4.9040902@nutechsolutions.de>
Hi Ulrich,
the commandline application and ktjview2 use the same library for
scheduling,
but the reporting algorithms may differ (read contain different bugs).
Which
date do you think is correct in your case?
Chris
On Thursday 10 February 2005 10:01, Ulrich Hammel wrote
> Hi there,
>
> using ktjview2 I discovered a deviation in the scheduling of task
> presented in the GUI and the schedule presented in the html and xml
> files. E.g., there is a task named XXX.Dev.GUI.Design and according to
> the Tasks-view it is scheduled
>
> XXX.Dev.GUI.Design GUI Design 15.2.2005 16:00 16.2.2005 15:59 3 ....
>
> while the XML-file produced by taskjuggler says:
>
> <task projectId="XXX" milestone="0" asapScheduling="1"
> priority="1000" id="XXX.Dev.GUI.Design" name="GUI Design" >
> <depends>XXX.Dev.Core.GuiInterf</depends>
> <depends>XXX.Dev.GUI.Basics</depends>
> <taskScenario complete="90" effort="2" scheduled="1"
> scenarioId="plan" >
> <start humanReadable="2005-01-31" >1107187200</start>
> <end humanReadable="2005-02-02" >1107360000</end>
> </taskScenario>
>
> (The snippets above are part of a test project which is already quite
> complex. Thus I avoided to post the complete project source)
>
> Question: Do ktjview2 and taskjuggler make use of different scheduling
> algorithms?
>
> Thank you,
> Uli
>
> --
>
>
> Ulrich Hammel
> Vice Managing Director German Operations
>
> NuTech Solutions GmbH
> Martin-Schmeißer-Weg 15
> 44227 Dortmund
> Germany
>
> Phone: +49 231 72546320
> Fax: +49 231 72546329
> Mobil: +49 173 5666359
> mailto: hammel@nutechsolutions.de
>
> www.nutechsolutions.de
> Adaptive Business Solutions
-- KDE 3.3: Conquer your Enterprise Desktop! See http://www.kde.org! GPG Key: 1024D/0500838B A5FE C051 2AFC 9A14 768A 5125 5829 5750 0500 838B -- Ulrich Hammel Vice Managing Director German Operations NuTech Solutions GmbH Martin-Schmeißer-Weg 15 44227 Dortmund Germany Phone: +49 231 72546320 Fax: +49 231 72546329 Mobil: +49 173 5666359 mailto: hammel@nutechsolutions.de www.nutechsolutions.de Adaptive Business Solutions
-- To unsubscribe, email the address listed in the List-Unsubscribe header For additional commands, email: taskjuggler-help@suse.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Mon Feb 14 2005 - 14:37:26 CET