[Deepsea-users] Official DeepSea package repositories

[Jan Fajerski]

On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 12:38:47PM +1000, Tim Serong wrote:
>On 07/04/2017 11:36 PM, Lenz Grimmer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm currently working on updating the upstream openATTIC 3.x
>> installation documentation to reflect the requirements of having a Ceph
>> cluster that has been deployed using DeepSea.
>>
>> Which is the official/up to date package repository on OBS that users of
>> the upstream packages should be using for installation?
>>
>> A search for "DeepSea" on OBS yields the following likely candidates:
>>
>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:swiftgist/deepsea
>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/filesystems:ceph/deepsea
>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/filesystems:ceph:luminous/deepsea
>>
>> The package in Eric's "swiftgist" home project (which used to be the
>> default location) is at version 0.7.13, while the one in the
>> ceph:luminous project is currently at 0.7.15, but it also contains a
>> 0.7.11 tarball, but that one does not seem to be used by the RPM spec file.
>
>That tarball just needs deleting.
>
>> The one in filesystems:ceph/deepsea is at version 0.7.11, too.
>>
>> I assume that for openATTIC 3.x and Ceph Luminous, the package in
>> filesystems:ceph:luminous/deepsea is the correct one to use, correct?
>
>Short version: yes.
>
>Long version: Right now, filesystems:ceph:luminous/deepsea is a link to
>filesystems:ceph/deepsea.  Both should thus be the latest and greatest,
>which means really filesystems:ceph:luminous/deepsea needs to be
>submitted to filesystems:ceph/deepsea to make that true.
>
>In future, we may end up with something like the following:
>
>- filesystems:ceph:jewel/deepsea (for deepsea version 0.6.x)
>- filesystems:ceph:luminous/deepsea (for deepsea version 0.7.x)
>- filesystems:ceph:m[whatever]/deepsea (etc.)
Seconded!
>
>...with the latest version always being a link to
>filesystems:ceph/deepsea.  This makes sense if we're maintaining
>multiple codestreams of deepsea.  If it turns out that we don't actually
>need to do that, and can just maintain a single codestream, we can drop
>the structure and only use filesystems:ceph/deepsea.
I think we already have two code streams for jewel and luminous/master.
I have a service file for deepsea...will chat with Eric today. So the packaging 
should become more formalised soon.
>
>Regards,
>
>Tim
>-- 
>Tim Serong
>Senior Clustering Engineer
>SUSE
>tserong at suse.com
>_______________________________________________
>Deepsea-users mailing list
>Deepsea-users at lists.suse.com
>http://lists.suse.com/mailman/listinfo/deepsea-users

-- 
Jan Fajerski
Engineer Enterprise Storage
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)